I’m not typically prone to engage old-media-vs.-new-media argle-bargle, largely because I think the whole bloggers-or-newspapers debate is based on a false premise. Who says you gotta pick one or the other? Isn’t a well-rounded media diet composed of getting your information from a multitude of sources, be it the kind printed on dead trees or the kind that flickers on LCD displays? That way you can get a wide variety of viewpoints and not necessarily be beholden to a single source with its attendant biases and predispositions.
Anyway.
Like I said, I’m not typically prone to this sort of thing, but I found this particular passage from T.J. Simers’ column striking for its these-damn-kids-with-their-InterWeb ethos:
From what I know about blogs, it doesn’t appear you need much more than someone who likes to hear themselves talk, who knows how to type and who also owns a computer. It’s not as if you have to interview anyone, or even attend a game, so long as you sound as if you know what you’re talking about o you know, kind of like sports talk radio.